Migrants working illegally still have employment rights
In the high profile lawsuit “Okedina v. ChiKale” [2019] EWCA Civ 1393, Ms. Okedina arranged for Ms. Chicale to move to the UK as a domestic worker and made an application for her British visa.
Ms. Okedina was not able to extend the visa of her domestic worker, hiding this fact from Ms. Chikale. In the end, the relationship between the employer and the employee was broken, and Ms. Cicale demanded compensation from Ms. Okedina for various violations of employment law, including illegal dismissal, racial discrimination and illegal deductions of wages.
Ms. Okedina's position was that Ms. Chikale did not have any employment rights because she worked in violation of UK immigration laws.
This argument failed in the employment tribunal, the employment appeal tribunal and, most recently, in the Court of Appeal. Lord Justice Underhill noted that he could not interpret the current legislation in favor of Ms. Okedina, stating that often in cases of illegal employment the employee himself was not at fault.
Posted on 20.08.2019.
We provide services
Other useful articles
- Nationality applications - guidance good character updated to clarify that applications made after 10 February 2025 that include illegal entry will normally be refused citizenship, regardless of when the illegal entry occurred
- Frequently asked questions: family member applications to the EU Settlement Scheme
- Children being sponsored by a parent or legal guardian: Homes for Ukraine
- EU Settlement Scheme status automation
- Significant changes made to guidance on sponsoring workers
- Court of Appeal allows appeal on EU Settlement Scheme dependency rules
Get specialist advice
Please contact with one of our immigration lawyers by phone +44 (0) 207 907 1460 (London), +971 509 265 140, +971 525 977 456 (Dubai) or complete our enquiry
Contact us