Government admits EU Settlement Scheme likely discriminates against women, disabled and other groups
The government has conceded that the EU Settlement Settlement probably discriminates against various groups protected by equality legislation but denies that it is unlawful, arguing that any discriminatory effects are justifiable.
Campaigners have long been pushing for publication of the official assessment of how the scheme caters for groups protected by the Equality Act 2010, such as women, disabled people and various minorities. Almost 4.3 million people have now applied for the right to stay in the UK after Brexit, exceeding the Home Office’s estimate of the eligible population, but concerns remain about underprivileged groups falling through the cracks.
The policy equality statement for the Settlement Scheme has now been published. It sets out the Home Office’s official position on whether the design and operation of the scheme comply with Equality Act requirements. The general theme is that, while there probably is at least indirect discrimination built into the process, it can be justified as a “proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim”. Hence there are no Equality Act problems.
For example, in considering indirect discrimination based on sex, the document notes that the automated checks of government databases for evidence of residence don’t cover certain welfare payments that women are more likely to receive, such as Child Benefit. While “this could put women at a particular disadvantage”, the potential discrimination is justified because the system “reduces the overall administrative burden on applicants in general”. The Home Office also points to how it has tried to “mitigate any potential disadvantage”, in this example by accepting a wide range of other residence evidence where the automated checks don’t pick somebody up.
Similarly, the fact that disabled people are likely to find the online process harder to navigate is justified by the aim of making the system simpler in general, and has been mitigated by funding for charities to help vulnerable people through the process.
That is essentially the flavour of the statement’s 105 pages: yes there is discrimination, no it’s not a legal issue. Further analysis of what the document says — and doesn’t say — may reveal whether that stance is justified.
Posted on 19.11.2020.
We provide services
Other useful articles
- On 24 July official visa fees rose by 20 percent for family visas and those on discretionary or human rights grounds
- Electronic visas (eVisas): who is affected and what steps to take now
- UK government launches new Border Security Command to fight illegal immigration
- Important changes regarding ILR under the 10-year long residence in the country - violation of the basic principle of law
- The approach to taxation of the Labour government: manifesto promises and key themes
- Labour Party’s immigration law policy as per their Party Manifesto 2024
Get specialist advice
Please contact with one of our immigration lawyers by phone +44 (0) 207 907 1460 (London), +971 509 265 140 (Dubai) or complete our enquiry
Contact us